(PS) Sharma v. HSI Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20222:20-cv-00921California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINOD SHARMA AND VINJAY L. No. 2:20-cv-921-JAM-KJN (PS)

SHARMA,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiffs, (ECF No. 34) v. HSI ASSET LOAN OBLIGATION TRUST 2001-1, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 On July 18, 2019, plaintiffs filed a complaint in California Superior Court alleging twelve claims against defendants HSI Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1 (“HSI Trust”), HSI Asset Securitization Corporation (“HSI Corp.”), and 100 does in connection with plaintiffs’ residential mortgage. (ECF No. 1-1 at 2, 7.) Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”), claiming to be the real party defendant in interest in this action as trustee for the HSI Trust, removed to this court and moved to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 1, 5.) Plaintiffs opposed dismissal, and moved to remand the case. (ECF No. 17.) The undersigned recommended plaintiff’s motion to remand be denied, and the case be dismissed under res judicata principles. (ECF No. 23.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.