Gopal

Gopal v. Luther

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20222:21-cv-00735California2,852 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Krishan K. Gopal, No. 2:21-cv-00735-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. Kapil Luther, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Krishan K. Gopal brings state law claims arising from a contractual dispute over acannabis business. Defendants removed the action to this court. Plaintiff moves to remand, and defendants move to dismiss. Both motions are fully briefed. The court grants plaintiff’s motion to remand, and therefore denies defendants’ motion to dismiss as moot. I. BACKGROUND California Relief LLC (CRL) is a cannabis cultivation business. Compl. at 6, Not. Removal, ECF No 1-1.! Krishan Gopal, Rakesh Rana, and defendants Brikena Luther and Kapil 24 Luther are all members of CRL. See Rana Decl. § 1, ECF No. 9-3; Purchase and Sale Agreement

' When citing documents filed with Nevada County Superior Court, the court uses the pagination automatically generated by this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.