Tappan

(PC) Jaramillo v. Tappan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20222:22-cv-00075California324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDIE A. JARAMILLO, No. 2:22-cv-0075-WBS-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS T. TAPPAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 7, 2022, the court informed plaintiff that he could proceed with a potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant correctional officer T. Tappan, or he could file an amended complaint in an effort to also state claims against defendants R. Ehlers, Faye, and Lieutenant Manes. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff has elected not to amend his complaint and to proceed only with the claim identified by the court. ECF No. 11. ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs claims against defendants R. 2 || Ehlers, Faye, and Lieutenant Manes be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.