Mejia

(PC) Henderson v. Mejia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20221:22-cv-00072California1,552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR., Case No. 1:22-cv-00072-BAK (BAM) (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO ACTION

RALPH MEJIA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

Defendants. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS BE DENIED

16 (ECF Nos. 2, 9)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Curtis Lee Henderson, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff has filed two applications to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 2, 9.) Because Plaintiff has three “strikes” under section 1915(g) and fails to show that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury, the Court recommends that Plaintiff’s motions be DENIED. I. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915 28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs proceedings in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The statute…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.