Broussard

(PC) Ekene v. Broussard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20222:20-cv-01255California2,812 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LINUS EKENE, Case No. 2:20-cv-01255-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO STAY

E. BROUSSARD & TILLERY, AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE

DENIED

Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS

16 ECF Nos. 35, 54, 56, 60, & 61

ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’

MOTIONS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME

AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY

THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO

COMPEL AND TO MODIFY THE

SCHEDULING ORDER

21 ECF Nos. 30, 46, 47, 52, 57, 59, & 63 22 Plaintiff Linus Ekene, a state prisoner without counsel, filed this section 1983 action, alleging that defendants E. Broussard and Tillery violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for engaging in protective conduct and denying him access…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.