Sherman

(PC) Keith Wright v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20221:21-cv-01111California528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH WRIGHT, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01111-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 3, 2022 STUART SHERMAN, et al., ) ) ORDER TERMINATING ACTION PURSUANT Defendants. ) TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY ) DISMISSAL ) ) (ECF Nos. 12, 13) )

Plaintiff Keith Wright is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice to voluntary dismiss this action pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has a right to voluntarily dismiss this case under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In Wilson v. City of San Jose, the Ninth Circuit explained: Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.