(PC) Henderson v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20221:21-cv-00932California876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCELLUS HENDERSON, 1:21-cv-00932-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

UNITED STATES, et al., BEFORE FILING SUIT (ECF No. 1.) Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO

RESPOND TO THIS ORDER

21 I. BACKGROUND Marcellus Henderson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On June 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) It appears on the face of Plaintiff’s Complaint that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 41 U.S.C. § 1997 (e)(a), before filing this lawsuit. II. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “[n]o…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.