(PC) Henderson v. United States
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20221:21-cv-00932California876 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARCELLUS HENDERSON, 1:21-cv-00932-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
UNITED STATES, et al., BEFORE FILING SUIT (ECF No. 1.) Defendants.
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO THIS ORDER
21 I. BACKGROUND Marcellus Henderson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On June 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) It appears on the face of Plaintiff’s Complaint that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 41 U.S.C. § 1997 (e)(a), before filing this lawsuit. II. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “[n]o…