Cisneros

(PC) Reynolds v. Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20221:20-cv-01101California2,739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FERDINAND REYNOLDS, 1:20-cv-01101-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY

ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT

vs. JUDGE TO THIS CASE

CISNEROS, et al., AND

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

17 (ECF No. 1.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

23 I. BACKGROUND Ferdinand Reynolds (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on August 10, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.