Baughman

(PC) Perryman v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20222:21-cv-00337California198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] DAVID PERRYMAN, No. 2:21-cv-0337 KIN P Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, requested that this action be dismissed. 19 || Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), plaintiff’s request shall be honored.! Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. || Dated: February 24, 2022 AO Norra KENDALL J. WEA perr0337. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 In voluntarily dismissing the action, plaintiff essentially chooses not to stand on his amended 26 || complaint but to withdraw it, which is his “absolute right.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing, Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (“It is well settled that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.