(SS) Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20221:22-cv-00227California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 JODI CLAIRE CLARK, CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-00227-BAK-GSA 7 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO Commissioner of Social Security, REQUIRE FILING FEE PAYMENT,

AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED Defendant. STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 (Docs. 3)

16 On February 23, 2022 Plaintiff filed a complaint in this Court and applied to proceed without prepayment of fees (in forma pauperis) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Docs. 1–3. I. Legal Standard In order to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, Plaintiff must submit an affidavit demonstrating that she “is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). “To proceed in forma pauperis is a privilege not a right.” Smart v. Heinze, 347 F.2d 114, 116 (9th Cir. 1965). In enacting the in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.