Preimesberger

Preimesberger v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20221:19-cv-01441California393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES R. PREIMESBERGER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01441-AWI-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER

Defendant. (ECF No. 46)

16 On July 30, 2021, a scheduling conference was held in this action. (ECF No. 45.) Pursuant to the matters discussed at the conference, the Court set a date for the filing of any amended pleadings, a date for the exchange of initial discovery, and set a status conference for March 1, 2022, to address the need for further scheduling. (ECF No. 46.) The Court ordered the parties to file a status report seven (7) days prior to the status conference. (Id.) The parties did not file a status report and the deadline has now expired. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.