(PC)Stevenson

(PC)Stevenson v. Holland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20221:16-cv-01831California1,942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 STEVENSON, CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01831-AWI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW WITH CONDITIONS

9 HOLLAND, et al., (Doc. No. 219) 10 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Douglas Stevenson filed this action through his counsel of record, Laurie Wilmore and Meredith Fahn (“Plaintiff’s Counsel”) on December 6, 2016, seeking damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law for harms allegedly suffered during his incarceration at the California Correctional Institute (“CCI”) in Tehachapi, California. Doc. No. 1. Now before the Court is a motion filed by Wilmore and Fahn to withdraw as Stevenson’s counsel. Doc. No. 219. BACKGROUND Wilmore and Fahn state in declarations supporting their motion that their fee agreement with Stevenson provides that Stevenson may discharge them at any time; that Stevenson discharged them on February 5, 2022; and that Stevenson informed them on February 5, 2022 (and reaffirmed on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.