(PC) Gann v. Valley State Prison
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20221:19-cv-01797California996 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN, 1:19-cv-01797-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR STAY UNDER RULE 56, WITHOUT
vs. PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL OF THE MOTION
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., (ECF No. 52.)
Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
14 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Nathaniel Marcus Gann is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, filed on February 7, 2020, against Defendants Warden Raythel Fisher, Jr., Dining Hall Officer Paez, and Culinary Staff Members Anguiano, Chapas, Lucero, Marquez, Cruz, and Moosebaur for violation of RLUIPA, violation of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause, and adverse conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment; against Defendants Warden Raythel Fisher, Jr., and Moosebaur for failure to protect…