Lattimore

(PC) Polk v. Lattimore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20221:12-cv-01156California5,688 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SUSAN MAE POLK, Case No. 1:12-cv-01156-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

LATTIMORE, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Defendants. (ECF No. 147) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I. Background Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint against Defendant Baron for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising from allegations that he placed a “snitch jacket” on Plaintiff by informing Inmate Miranda that Plaintiff had reported Inmate Miranda’s threats on Plaintiff’s life. On July 23,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.