Hogan
Williams v. Hogan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CLIFTON WILLIAMS, JR., Case No. 1:22-cv-00044-DAD-SAB
Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF (ECF No. 1) CALIFORNIA, et al., THIRTY DAY DEADLINE Defendants.
17 Clifton Williams, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s 19 complaint, filed on January 11, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) 20 I.
SCREENING REQUIREMENT
22 Notwithstanding any filing fee, the court shall dismiss a case if at any time the Court 23 determines that the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which 24 relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from 25 such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) 26 (section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis complaints, not just those filed by…