Webb

(PC) Gibbs v. Webb

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20222:18-cv-02817California1,275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT A. GIBBS, No. 2:18-cv-2817 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. WEBB, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel discovery. (ECF No. 43.) In addition, defendants County of Shasta, Webb, Barnhart, Reed, Rodgers, and Kent (collectively, the “Shasta County defendants”) have filed a motion for partial summary judgment and noticed a hearing to take place on March 4, 2022. (ECF No. 44.) For the reasons set forth, the court will deny the motion to compel as untimely and inadequately supported, vacate the hearing on defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, and order that a substitution of attorney be filed for defendants Webb, Barnhart, Reed, Rodgers, and Kent if the motion for partial summary judgment is to be considered on their behalf. Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.