Newsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Samuel Lee Gore, No. 2:21-cv-01189-KJM-DMC Plaintiff, ORDER v. Gavin Newsom, 1S Defendant. 16 The court construes the request at ECF No. 19 as a motion for relief from the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). See Am. Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Constr. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 898-99 (9th Cir. 2001) (explaining motions to reconsider filed after 20 timeline under Rule 59(e) are automatically construed as Rule 60(b) motions). The motion, so construed, is denied. Plaintiff has not offered new evidence, identified a change in the controlling 22 law, or shown clear error or manifest injustice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(6); Am. Ironworks, 248 F.3d at 899. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 25, 2022. ee

CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE