Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONNELL DAVIS, Case No. 2:19-cv-01976-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED B. HARRIS, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS Defendant. ECF No. 30 16 17 Plaintiff, a diabetic inmate with a prescription for a daily diabetic snack, filed a grievance indicating that he occasionally did not receive his snack. He alleges that after he filed his grievance, two psychiatric technicians—defendants Harris and Hunter—withheld his snack three days in a row in violation of his First and Eighth Amendment rights. Defendants move for summary judgment, arguing that they were not responsible for giving him his snack and that they took no action against him in response to his grievance. Additionally, they claim that they are entitled to qualified immunity. Summary Judgment Standard Summary judgment is…