Schrenk
Schrenk v. Carvana, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH SCHRENK, dba THE CAR No. 2:19-cv-01302-TLN-CKD BARN, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER v. CARVANA, LLC; and CARVANA
GROUP, LLC,
16 Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Carvana, LLC and Carvana Group, LLC’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff Keith Schrenk (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion (ECF No. 28), and Defendants replied (ECF No. 29). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Court need not recount the background facts of the instant case as they are set forth fully in its July 28, 2020 Order. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff asserts three causes of action against Defendants in his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”): (1) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Business & Professions…