(PS) Guo v. Department of State

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20222:21-cv-01597California944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHENHAO GUO, No. 2:21-cv-1597 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND DEPARTMENT OF STATE; ANTHONY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE,

15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Chenhao Guois proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 30, 2021, defendant noticed a motion to dismiss for hearing before the undersigned on January 28, 2022. (ECF No. 5.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) plaintiff was to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion “not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” Plaintiff, however, failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. Accordingly, on January 24, 2022, the court issued an order to show cause, ordering plaintiff to show cause in writing within fourteen days as to why this action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.