Connelly

Connelly v. Starbucks Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20221:21-cv-00746California382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KERRY CONNELLY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00746-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY MATTER SHOULD

v. NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

COMPLY AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

STARBUCKS CORPORATION,

FIVE-DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16 On March 29, 2021, Kerry Connelly (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, filed this action in the Stanislaus County Superior Court against Starbucks Corporation (“Defendant”) alleging violations of California labor law. (ECF No. 1-2.) On May 7, 2021, Defendant removed the action to the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On June 24, 2021, the Court issued a scheduling order. (ECF No. 7.) Pursuant to the scheduling order, the deadline to file a motion for class certification was January 18, 2022. (Id.) That deadline has passed, and no motion has been filed, nor has Plaintiff requested an extension of time to do so. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.