Kuersten
(PC) Priest v. Kuersten
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PRIEST, No. 2: 21-cv-0058 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BENTLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions for sanctions and second motion for an extension of time to conduct discovery. (ECF Nos. 39, 40.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motions are denied. Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions On December 7, 2021, the undersigned granted in part and denied in part plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 37.) In relevant part, the undersigned ordered defendant Kuersten to provide plaintiff with further responses to interrogatories nos. 2 and 4 within thirty days of the date of the order. (Id.) /// /// /// In the pending motion, plaintiff appears to argue that defendants failed to comply with the December 7, 2021 order requiring them…