(PC)Witkin

(PC)Witkin v. Snelling

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20222:21-cv-02181California1,398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, No. 2:21-cv-2181 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C. SNELLING, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 24, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 3. The motion accompanies a complaint that asserts multiple claims against numerous named and unnamed officials at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”). ECF No. 1. The claims arise from a series of allegedly retaliatory and otherwise unconstitutional disciplinary charges and resulting sanctions including administrative segregation. Id. The complaint has been screened and found not to state a claim for relief as pleaded. ECF No. 11. For the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.