(PC) Kononov v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20222:21-cv-02076California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VITALY KONONOV, No. 2:21-cv-2076 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 3, 2021, Plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit, a completed, certified copy of his inmate trust account statement, and a first amended complaint, and he was given thirty days within which to do so. See ECF No. 5 at 2. At that time, Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to fully comply with the Court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. See id. Plaintiff’s thirty-day period to file the required documents has expired, and he has not filed them. On December 13, 2021, the Court’s order was returned to it as “undeliverable, RTS, not in custody.” Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), however, service of documents at the address of record for Plaintiff is fully effective. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.