Zetz

Zetz v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20221:19-cv-00451California9,169 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AUTUMN ZETZ, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00451-AWI-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO QUASH SUBPOENA OF NON-PARTY

v. GREG VIGNA OR ALTERNATIVELY

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, (ECF No. 75) Defendant.

16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Autumn Zetz (“Zetz”) and Eric Zetz’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) motion to quash or alternatively impose a protective order regarding the notice of deposition and subpoena to testify at a deposition in a civil action for nonparty Greg Vigna (“Vigna”) served by Defendant Boston Scientific Corporation (“Defendant”). The Court heard oral argument on the motion to quash on February 23, 2022 via Zoom videoconference. Counsel Lourdes DeArmas of the Dolan Law Firm appeared by videoconference for Plaintiffs. Counsel Karen Firstenberg of Faegre Drinker Biddle Reath LLP appeared by …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.