Martel

(HC) Williams v. Martel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20222:18-cv-02224California666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 DAVID EARL WILLIAMS, No. 2:18-cv-02224 KJM DB 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER

MICHAEL MARTEL,

15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Presently before the court is petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his fifth request for an extension of time to file objections. (ECF No. 36.) The undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that the petition be denied on August 4, 2021. (ECF No. 24.) Since that date petitioner has sought and received four extensions of time to file objections. (ECF Nos. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32.) When the third motion for an extension of time was granted, petitioner was advised that absent extraordinary circumstances no further extension of time would be granted. (ECF No. 32.) When petitioner’s fourth motion for an extension of time was granted in part, the court again advised no further extensions would be granted absent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.