McMillan

McMillan v. County of Shasta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20222:20-cv-00564California1,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JAMES I. McMILLAN, No. 2:20-cv-00564-JAM-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

COUNTY OF SHASTA, a public entity, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Before the Court is James I. McMillan’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for reconsideration of: (1) the Court’s February 1, 2021 Order (“First Order”) at ECF No. 38 granting the Anderson Fire Protection District and Fire Chief Steve Lowe’s (“Fire Defendants”) motion to dismiss and the City of Anderson and Anderson Police Officer Kameron Lee’s (“City Defendants”) motion to dismiss; and (2) the Court’s October 25, 2021 Order at ECF No. 55 (“Second Order”) granting the Fire and City Defendants’ second motions to dismiss with prejudice. See Mot. for Reconsideration (“Mot.”), ECF No. 59. The Fire Defendants

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for March 1, 2022. opposed Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.