(PC)Ausborn
(PC)Ausborn v. California Health Care Facility
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY AUSBORN, No. 2:20-cv-0590 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE FACILITY, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 21, 2021, court orders that had been served on Plaintiff’s address of record which granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis and directed him to file an amended complaint (see ECF Nos. 8, 9) were returned by the postal service. It appears that Plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the Court of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the Court order was returned by the postal service, and…