Jones

(PC) Villery v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20221:15-cv-01360California594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED M. VILLERY, Case No. 1:15-cv-01360-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

CONSTRUED MOTION FOR PERMISSION

v. TO FILE LIMITED SURREPLY AND

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

JAY JONES, ET. AL., FILE SURREPLY Defendants. (Doc. No. 174) 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a surreply, filed on February 22, 2022. (Doc. No. 174). Noting the dates on which Plaintiff filed his opposition to the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Defendants Yerton, Schmidt, Escarcega, and Jones, and Defendants’ reply (Doc. No. 171), Plaintiff requests a extension of time until March 9, 2022 to file a surreply. (Id. at 1-2). Parties do not have the right to file surreplies and motions are deemed submitted when the time to reply has expired. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(l); see also Garcia v. Biter, 195 F. Supp.3d at 1131, 1133 (E.D. Cal. July 18,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.