Safy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-0637-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

P. SAFY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court previously concluded in its order granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis that plaintiff is a “three strikes” litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 15 at 2. But the court also found that plaintiff’s allegations qualified for the imminent danger exception to the three strikes bar because of his claim that he had been denied medical care for severe injuries and illnesses because of his refusal to be tested for COVID-19. Id. Plaintiff has since filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 18), which the court must screen, and a motion entitled “Motion for Emergency Relief . . .” (ECF No. 20). For the reasons stated below, the amended…