Parker

(PC) Bettencourt v. Parker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20221:16-cv-00150California866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY RAY BETTENCOURT, Case No. 1:16-cv-00150-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR NEW

DOCKETING OF THE ENTIRE CASE

v. FILING AND EARLY NOTICE OF APPEAL

OR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

PARKER, et al., (ECF No. 105) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Gary Ray Bettencourt (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims of deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendant Crooks for pulling two teeth that did not need to be pulled, and against Defendants Parker and Guzman for filing down six healthy teeth with a dental tool used for drilling cavities. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting “new docketing of the entire case filing,” a notice of change of address, and “early notice of appeal, or interlocutory appeal, leave to file.” (ECF No. 105.) It appears…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.