Shelton

(PC) Wilson v. Shelton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20222:21-cv-00091California3,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMEL JOWAN WILSON, No. 2:21-cv-0091 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

R. SHELTON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has also filed a motion for an injunction. ECF No. 6. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff will be given the opportunity to amend the complaint. In addition, the undersigned will recommend that Plaintiff’s motion for an injunction be denied. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.