Costanzo

Costanzo v. City of Stockton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20222:18-cv-01803California846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARSHA COSTANZO,

Plaintiff, No. 2:18-cv-01803-TLN-AC

13 v. ORDER CITY OF STOCKTON, et al., 15 Defendants,

17 18 19 Plaintiff Marsha Costanzo (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action on June 25, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) On July 26, 2021, the Court issued a minute order stating “[p]ursuant to the Court’s Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order . . . the parties were directed to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness (“JNTR”) . . . . As of today’s date, no dispositive motion or JNTR has been filed. Accordingly, not later than fourteen (14) days following the date of this Order, the parties are directed to file a JNTR. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions.” (ECF No. 19.) On August 10, 2021, Defendants filed a response stating that Plaintiff’s counsel indicated Plaintiff intended to dismiss the case as “counsel for both parties agree that the evidence does not demonstrate a violation of Plaintiff’s civil rights.” (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.