CDCR

(PS) Raghukultilak v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20222:19-cv-00455California2,227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BHARATH RAGHUKULTILAK., No. 2:19-CV-0455-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 27, supporting memorandum, ECF No. 28, request for judicial notice, ECF NO. 29, separate statement of undisputed facts, ECF No. 30, and exhibits, ECF No. 31. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c), the matter was submitted on the papers without oral argument. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for summary judgment or summary adjudication when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.