Kernan

(PC) Adkins v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20222:19-cv-00458California2,073 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, No. 2:19-CV-0458-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint. ECF No. 44. The Court must screen complaints from prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). A complaint must contain a short and plain statement of the claim that a plaintiff is entitled to relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). The complaint must provide “enough facts to state a claim to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.