(SS) Hector Narvaiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20221:20-cv-00848California7,284 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

17 On June 17, 2020, Plaintiff Hector Narvaiz (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.2

1 On July 9, 2021, Kilolo Kijakazi was named Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See https://www.ssa.gov/history/commissioners.html. She is therefore substituted as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in [their] official capacity, be the proper defendant”). 2 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (See Doc. 12.) II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.