Canterberry

Canterberry v. Siemens Mobility, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20222:20-cv-02361California4,259 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

GREGORY G. ISKANDER, Bar No. 200215 giskander@littler.com YESENIA GARCIA PEREZ, Bar No. 264880 ygarciaperez@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON P.C. Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard, Suite 600 Walnut Creek, California 94597 Telephone: 925.932.2468 Fax No.: 925.946.9809 6 Attorneys for Defendant SIEMENS MOBILITY INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 TOMMY CANTERBERRY, Case No. 2:20-CV-02361-KJM-KJN) Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

v.

ACARA SOLUTIONS, INC., a New Complaint filed: October 2, 2020 York business organization; SIEMENS (Sacramento County Superior Court MOBILITY INC., a Delaware business Case No.: 34-2020-002-86414) organization; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 17 Defendants.

19

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Tommy Canterberry (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Siemens Mobility Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into this Stipulated Protective Order. 1. Agreements. a. Plaintiffs …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.