(PC)Royal

(PC)Royal v. Ierokomos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20222:20-cv-00218California1,720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 FREDDIE LAMONT ROYAL, No. 2:20-CV-00218-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

ALEXANDER IEROKOMOS,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, ECF No. 15. 19 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 20 against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or 22 malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief 23 from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Moreover, 24 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require that complaints contain a “. . . short and plain 25 statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). This 26 means that claims must be stated simply, concisely, and directly. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.