Hanson

(PS) Gifford v. Hanson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20222:21-cv-00119California6,650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER GIFFORD, No. 2:21-CV-0119-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICHELE HANSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court are: (1) Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 10, for default judgment; (2) Defendants’ motion, ECF No. 14, to dismiss; and (3) Defendant’s motion, ECF No. 15, to set aside entry of default. All three motions have been briefed and submitted without oral argument. 21 I. BACKGROUND A. Plaintiff’s Allegations This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s original complaint. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiff names the following as defendants: (1) Michele Hanson; (2) Robert Puckett, Sr.; (3) Melissa Tulledo; (4) Patricia Brown; (5) Julie Bowles; (6) Kevin Dixon; (7) Clint Dingman; and (8) the Hornbrook Community Services District (HCSD). See id. at 1. Plaintiff alleges the individual 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.