Williams v. Drakaina Logistics

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20221:21-cv-01436California625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01436-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO v.

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S

ORDER AND FOR FAILURE TO DRAKAINA LOGISTICS, et al., PROSECUTE 13 Defendants. (Doc. 6)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

16 On September 28, 2021, Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on September 30, 2021. (Docs. 2 & 3.) On October 14, 2021, before the Court screened the initial complaint, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint as a matter of course, see Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1). (Doc. 4.) On January 3, 2022, the undersigned issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and granted Plaintiff twenty-one days leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.