Williams v. Drakaina Logistics
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01436-JLT-SKO
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO v.
COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S
ORDER AND FOR FAILURE TO DRAKAINA LOGISTICS, et al., PROSECUTE 13 Defendants. (Doc. 6)
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
16 On September 28, 2021, Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on September 30, 2021. (Docs. 2 & 3.) On October 14, 2021, before the Court screened the initial complaint, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint as a matter of course, see Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1). (Doc. 4.) On January 3, 2022, the undersigned issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and granted Plaintiff twenty-one days leave to…