Mendoza

Mendoza v. Valley Transportation, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20221:21-cv-01786California3,619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW MENDOZA, No. 1:21-cv-01786-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX

PARTE APPLICATION FOR VOLUNTARY

VALLEY TRANSPORTATION, INC., et DIMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE al., (Doc. No. 13) Defendants.

17 Before the court is plaintiff Andrew Mendoza’ s ex parte application for a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Procedure 41(a)(2) with respect to all of plaintiff’s claims brought against defendants Valley Transportation, Inc., Rodney Heintz, and Deborah Simpson. (Doc. No. 13.) The court ordered briefing based on plaintiff’s indication that defendants opposed the voluntary dismissal. (Doc. No. 14.) On February 11, 2022, defendants filed their opposition to plaintiff’s application and objections to plaintiff’s counsel’s declaration filed in support of the application. (Doc. Nos. 17, 18.) On February 15, 2022, plaintiff filed his reply. (Doc. No. 19.) For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.