Gastelo

(HC) Barton v. Gastelo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20222:21-cv-01933California417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM RAY BARTON, Case No. 2:21-cv-01933-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER FINDING THAT THE PETITION IS

TIME-BARRED AND GRANTING LEAVE

v. TO AMEND WITHIN THIRTY DAYS JOSIE GASTELO, ECF No. 1 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After reviewing the petition, I find that it is time-barred. I will give petitioner an opportunity to amend before recommending that this action be dismissed. The amended petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned to the habeas proceeding must examine the habeas petition and order a response to the petition unless it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.