(PC) Mustill v. Sacramento County Main Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20222:21-cv-01720California834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN E. MUSTILL, No. 2:21-cv-1720 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIN JAIL, et al.,, 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and plaintiff has paid the filing fee. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Plaintiff has filed a complaint and an amended complaint. Since the amended complaint supersedes the original,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.