Warden

(PC) Foust v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20222:21-cv-00312California429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CARL FOUST, No. 2:21-CV-0312-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARDEN, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On August 9, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Plaintiff requested a 30-day extension to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 25, which this court granted, ECF No. 29. Plaintiff filed a document the court construed as a second amended complaint. ECF No. 30. However, the document contained no pleadings or allegations; and the magistrate judge then allowed plaintiff 30 days to refile. ECF No. 32. Plaintiff requested an additional 30 days, ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.