Khoo

(PC) Gray v. Khoo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20221:20-cv-01047California1,141 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA GRAY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO v. ) STAY DEPOSITION AND MOTION FOR

PROTECTIVE ORDER

A. KHOO, et al., ) ) (ECF Nos. 65, 67) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay her deposition and motion for a protective order, filed separately on March 3, 2022. Defendants have not yet had an opportunity to respond to Plaintiff’s filing, but the Court finds a response unnecessary. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motions are deemed submitted. Local Rule 230(l). I. DISCUSSION The Court is vested with broad discretion to manage discovery. Dichter-Mad…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.