Federal Trade Commission v. Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. 1:20-cv-01060-DAD-SKO
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE
v. RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
(Doc. 72)
GOLDEN SUNRISE NUTRACEUTICAL,
INC., ET AL., Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 This matter is before the Court on a motion to be relieved as counsel filed by Edgar H. Sevilla III, Esq. (“Attorney Sevilla”) and Joseph La Costa, Esq. (“Attorney La Costa”), co-counsel for Defendants Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc., Golden Sunrise Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Huu Tieu (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 72) By minute order entered January 25, 2022, the Court directed the parties to file responses to the motion by February 11, 2022. (Doc. 75.) Plaintiff timely filed a “partial opposition” to the motion (Doc. 77), and none of the defendants responded. The matter is deemed submitted on the papers. See E.D. L.R. 230(g). As explained below, the motion is GRANTED as to Attorney Sevilla, and…