Federal Trade Commission v. Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20221:20-cv-01060California1,153 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. 1:20-cv-01060-DAD-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE

v. RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

(Doc. 72)

GOLDEN SUNRISE NUTRACEUTICAL,

INC., ET AL., Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 This matter is before the Court on a motion to be relieved as counsel filed by Edgar H. Sevilla III, Esq. (“Attorney Sevilla”) and Joseph La Costa, Esq. (“Attorney La Costa”), co-counsel for Defendants Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc., Golden Sunrise Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Huu Tieu (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 72) By minute order entered January 25, 2022, the Court directed the parties to file responses to the motion by February 11, 2022. (Doc. 75.) Plaintiff timely filed a “partial opposition” to the motion (Doc. 77), and none of the defendants responded. The matter is deemed submitted on the papers. See E.D. L.R. 230(g). As explained below, the motion is GRANTED as to Attorney Sevilla, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.