Khoo

(PC) Gray v. Khoo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20221:20-cv-01047California844 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA GRAY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR CLARIFICATION

A. KHOO, et al., ) (ECF No. 66) )

Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for clarification, filed March 3, 2022. This action is proceeding against Defendants R. Mitchell, I. Singh, and G. Song for denial of Plaintiff’s revision surgery; against Defendant Mitchell for directing that her Gabapentin be terminated in violation of the Eighth Amendment; against Defendant Mitchell for denial of pain medication in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and against Defendants Mitchell, Singh, and Song for medical malpractice for denial of her revision surgery. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.