Tingley

(PC) Oliver v. Tingley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20221:22-cv-00071California4,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY LADEL OLIVER, Case No. 1:22-cv-0071-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT LT. J. TINGLEY, et al., (ECF No. 1) Defendants.

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

16 17 Plaintiff Anthony Oliver (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on January 19 19, 2022, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 1.)

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

21 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 22 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous 24 or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary 25 relief from a defendant who is immune from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.