Padilla

(PC) Rivas v. Padilla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20221:21-cv-00212California3,653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL J. RIVAS, 1:21-cv-00212-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER

vs. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF RULE 8(a), WITH PADILLA et al., LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT NOT EXCEEDING

Defendants. PAGES

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER FOR CLERK TO SEND

PLAINTIFF A CIVIL COMPLAINT

FORM 19 20 I. BACKGROUND Daniel J. Rivas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 19, 2021, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action, which is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.