Zepp

(PC) Turner v. Zepp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20221:20-cv-00184California5,939 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

21 A. Screening, Service, and Scheduling Order 22 Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants Andrew Zepp and Khaled A. Tawansy (“Defendants”) on January 31, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint alleges that, following sinus surgery, he told Defendant Zepp he was experiencing pain and needed to be seen right away. (Id.) Plaintiff did not receive treatment for several days, resulting in a significant infection, pain, swelling, permanent injury, and loss of facial bone. (Id.) On June 23, 2020, the Court issued a screening order finding that the complaint stated a cognizable claim against Defendants for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 15.) The same day, the Court issued an order finding service of the complaint appropriate. (ECF No. 16.) The Court ordered service to proceed under the Court’s E-Service pilot program and, on June 30, 2020, the California Department of Corrections returned a notice of intent not to waive service as to Defendant Tawansy. (ECF No. 19.) Service documents for Defendant Tawansy were forwarded to the United States Marshal 5 Service…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.